![]() |
HOME | 最近の活動 | JSACについて | 背景と目的 | プロジェクト概要 | 資料 | リンク | ギャラリー |
Project Manager,Japan Assistance Team for Small Arms Management in Cambodia
(JSAC) Thank
you Mr. Chairman, Japan Assistance Team for Small Arms Management in Cambodia (JSAC) has supported the Royal Government of Cambodia in carrying out “Peace Building and Comprehensive Small Arms Management Programme in Cambodia” since April 2003. I am Yasumitsu Kida, Project Manager of the Team. Our programme aims to address SALW issues in Cambodia through “the effective collection, storage and destruction of SALW” as an implementation effort on the ground of the Programme of Action. Demand Factors of SALW Possession Mr.
Chairman, Why
do people in post-conflict countries want to keep their SALW? While the situation is improving thanks to
the efforts made by the Government of Cambodia as well as by donors, deepening
our knowledge of demand factors by addressing this fundamental question would
be valuable for formulating more effective projects. We have identified three major factors from
our experience in Cambodia. First,
people try to protect their families from dangers on their own due to the sense
of insecurity. Second, the long conflict
may have undermined a “Culture of Peace.”
Finally, in Cambodia, some people still believe that SALW have economic
value and expect to receive other goods or services in exchange for turning them. JSAC’s Project as one of the Best
Practices Mr.
Chairman, I
would like to introduce three JSAC projects designed to tackle those demand
factors in Cambodia. The
first project is the Weapons Reduction and Development for Peace (WDP) Project,
in which, JSAC encourages civilians to voluntarily surrender SALW through
educational workshops and offers development projects to communities which have
surrendered all weapons. In addition,
JSAC supports local police capacity by providing necessary training and
materials in order to improve public security and residents’ confidence in the
relevant authorities. Our approach is neither
buyback nor exchange of weapons, but encourages people to voluntarily surrender
SALW through a series of workshops to raise awareness. For instance, in March 2006, 2,482 cached
weapons believed to be once owned by the Khmer Rouge were discovered thanks to
a report by a participant at JSAC’s workshop.
Overall, a total of 20,493 SALW have been surrendered through the Weapons
Reduction and Development for Peace Project so far. This project contributes to overcoming all
demand factors mentioned earlier; removing people’s perceived need to protect
their own lives with SALW by improving security; building capacity of and
confidence in police; facilitating “Culture of Peace” through educational
workshops and the surrender of weapons; and promoting the understanding that
weapons do not have any monetary value. The
second project is the Weapons Destruction Project. This project aims to burn and destroy weapons
collected from civilians through the Weapons Reduction and Development for Peace
Project as well as surplus weapons in police possession, so that they can never
be used again. This project contributes
to improving physical security by preventing the illicit flow of SALW. The
third project is the Safe Storage and Registration Project. This project aims to build a safe and proper
stockpiling system for legally possessed weapons by police, and prevent their
outflow to civilians’ hands. JSAC
supports the Ministry of Interior in managing effective stockpiling and
registration systems for their weapons.
This project contributes to building capacity of and confidence in
police forces. You
can find information on this in the orange-colored pamphlet distributed by my
delegation. Lessons Learned Mr.
Chairman, I
would like to conclude by making two recommendations acknowledged through our
project implementation. First,
a comprehensive approach, which covers weapons collection, destruction and
stockpile management, is essential in tackling SALW problems in affected
countries. JSAC is aiming to reduce, on
the one hand, the number of weapons illegally possessed by civilians through the
Weapons Reduction and Development for Peace Project, and on the other hand, the
dangers presented by theft of stockpiled weapons of police, through the Safe
Storage and Registration Project.
Eventually, collected illegal and surplus legal weapons are destroyed by
the Weapons Destruction Project. If a program
lacks any one of the elements I have already mentioned, it may face
difficulties. In that case, the illicit
circulation of weapons will never be stopped. Second,
SALW programs, especially as a part of weapons collection, should be tailored
to the circumstances of each affected country. In Cambodia, we try to educate people about
danger and illegality of weapons in workshops and to foster a “Culture of Peace.” In our view, this approach is the most
effective in the Cambodian context. In
some cases, when buyback schemes or weapons for development projects are in
place, people may be led to think that holding weapons yields monetary or
non-monetary benefits, and thus not surrender all of them. However, if a “Culture of Peace” is deeply
rooted among the people, they will surrender weapons more voluntarily. In fact, as I mentioned before, a village
chief who attended a workshop subsequently showed us the location of 2,482 guns. For him, what was important was not to
receive development projects in exchange for weapons, but to enhance the public
safety of his village. Thus, it is clear
that SALW projects should take into account the background of target countries
and be designed specifically for each. In
conclusion, we believe the best practices of implemented projects, including
the experience of the NGOs active on the ground, should be further shared
internationally. If we share our lessons
today and make good use of them, it will help a great deal in solving SALW
problems in affected countries. Thank
you. |
トップ | サイトマップ | このサイトについて | メール |